<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PittGeek &#187; .NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/category/net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog</link>
	<description>A blog only a geek could love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Studio 2008 Database Edition and SQL Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2009/01/23/visual-studio-2008-database-edition-and-sql-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2009/01/23/visual-studio-2008-database-edition-and-sql-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently went through the unfortunate demise of the primary disk on my main development machine, so I had to rebuild my dev environment from scratch. I have a test server running SQL Server 2005, so I decided to install SQL Server 2008 on my dev machine for compatibility testing. Imagine my frustration when I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently went through the unfortunate demise of the primary disk on my main development machine, so I had to rebuild my dev environment from scratch. I have a test server running SQL Server 2005, so I decided to install SQL Server 2008 on my dev machine for compatibility testing. Imagine my frustration when I tried to load up my database project in Visual Studio 2008 and was told that I needed a local instance of SQL Server 2005!</p>
<p>Fortunately, Microsoft has a <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/gertd/archive/2008/11/25/visual-studio-team-system-2008-database-edition-gdr-rtm.aspx">new GDR release of Database Edition</a> that adds support for SQL Server 2008. Unfortunately, this isn&#8217;t just a service pack, it&#8217;s more like a product upgrade. An upgrade of your database project is required, and the project will no longer be usable by other developers on the team if they haven&#8217;t upgraded to the GDR release also. Oh well, I guess you can&#8217;t have everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2009/01/23/visual-studio-2008-database-edition-and-sql-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WCF Services with the .asmx extension</title>
		<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/10/16/wcf-services-with-the-asmx-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/10/16/wcf-services-with-the-asmx-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/10/16/wcf-services-with-the-asmx-extension/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When creating a new Windows Communication Foundation web service, the default extension is .svc. This can be a problem if you want to migrate an existing .NET web service where clients may have hard-coded the .asmx extension. The following article from MSDN Blogs shows how to configure a WCF web service that uses the .asmx [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When creating a new Windows Communication Foundation web service, the default extension is .svc. This can be a problem if you want to migrate an existing .NET web service where clients may have hard-coded the .asmx extension. The following article from MSDN Blogs shows how to configure a WCF web service that uses the .asmx extension:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/wenlong/archive/2007/09/18/how-to-use-asmx-extension-to-handle-wcf-requests.aspx">Wenlong Dong&#8217;s Blog : How to use .asmx extension to handle WCF requests?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/10/16/wcf-services-with-the-asmx-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Templates in ASP.NET User Controls</title>
		<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/27/templates-in-aspnet-user-controls/</link>
		<comments>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/27/templates-in-aspnet-user-controls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/27/templates-in-aspnet-user-controls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the standard ASP.NET server controls allow the user to specify a template containing custom markup that will be used inside the server control. It is possible to create &#8220;.ascx&#8221; user controls that make use of this type of template. The MSDN documentation explains how.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the standard ASP.NET server controls allow the user to specify a template containing custom markup that will be used inside the server control. It is possible to create &#8220;.ascx&#8221; user controls that make use of this type of template. The <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/36574bf6.aspx">MSDN documentation explains how</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/27/templates-in-aspnet-user-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C# 3.0 features for .NET 2.0</title>
		<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/17/c-30-features-for-net-20/</link>
		<comments>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/17/c-30-features-for-net-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/17/c-30-features-for-net-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When discussing the new features in Visual Studio 2008, LINQ gets most of the press. However, LINQ only works if you are targeting the .NET 3.5 Framework. Another new feature of Visual Studio 2008 is the ability to choose which Framework version to target, and sometimes you just don&#8217;t have the luxury of upgrading all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When discussing the new features in Visual Studio 2008, <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb308959.aspx">LINQ</a> gets most of the press. However, LINQ only works if you are targeting the .NET 3.5 Framework. Another new feature of Visual Studio 2008 is the ability to choose which Framework version to target, and sometimes you just don&#8217;t have the luxury of upgrading all your users to the latest Framework. Fortunately several of the new language features in C# 3.0 don&#8217;t require library support, so here are some useful enhancements that work just fine when targeting the .NET 2.0 Framework.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx">Lambda Expressions</a> (more via <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ericwhite/pages/Lambda-Expressions.aspx">Eric White</a> and <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/04/08/new-orcas-language-feature-lambda-expressions.aspx">Scott Guthrie</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb384054.aspx">Auto-Implemented Properties</a> (more via <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx">Scott Guthrie</a> and <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/archive/2007/12/04/c-3-0-features-automatic-properties.aspx">Dan Wahlin</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb384062.aspx">Object and Collection Initializers</a> (more via <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/archive/2007/09/09/c-3-0-features-object-initializers.aspx">Dan Wahlin</a> and <a href="http://www.developer.com/net/csharp/article.php/3607421">developer.com</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb384061.aspx">Implicitly Typed Local Variables</a> (more via <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/05/15/new-orcas-language-feature-anonymous-types.aspx">Scott Guthrie</a>)</li>
<li><del datetime="2008-06-17T16:12:13+00:00"><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb383977.aspx">Extension Methods</a> (more via <a href="http://www.developer.com/net/csharp/article.php/3592216">developer.com</a> and <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/13/new-orcas-language-feature-extension-methods.aspx">Scott Guthrie</a>)</del><br />
    <strong>Update:</strong> It turns out that the compiler attaches an attribute to extension methods that is not defined in the .NET 2.0 library, so extension methods can only be used with .NET 3.5 after all.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/17/c-30-features-for-net-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebResource.axd mystery solved</title>
		<link>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/07/webresourceaxd-mystery-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/07/webresourceaxd-mystery-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/07/webresourceaxd-mystery-solved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly blog posts have been very sparse here, so I&#8217;m going to try something new. Whenever I find a good article or web site that helps me solve a particular problem I&#8217;m having, I&#8217;ll try to dash off a quick post referencing it. This&#8217;ll help me locate the information if I need it again later, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly blog posts have been very sparse here, so I&#8217;m going to try something new. Whenever I find a good article or web site that helps me solve a particular problem I&#8217;m having, I&#8217;ll try to dash off a quick post referencing it. This&#8217;ll help me locate the information if I need it again later, and maybe it will help someone else find what they&#8217;re looking for too.</p>
<p>Have you ever noticed those strange &#8220;WebResource.axd&#8221; URLs that ASP.NET likes to generate? I recently needed to return a JavaScript resource from a custom ASP.NET control and wondered if I could take advantage of &#8220;WebResource.axd&#8221; myself. Via ASP.NET blogger Jeff Putz, <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2005/07/18/419842.aspx"><em>Using WebResource.axd for embedded resources</em></a> shows you how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittcrew.net/geekblog/2008/05/07/webresourceaxd-mystery-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

